ESSENTIAL STEPS FOR AN EXCELLENT REVIEW

  • # STEP 01 - READ THE BOOK

    We know that this is a tip that would not need to be on this list, but be careful.

    It is not appropriate to make a critical review of a legal book without reading all of its content, as the author built it as a system.

    Advice from Bob, who's working as writer in https://payforessay.pro/math-homework-help/: Using excerpts from the work in order to summarize it will not cover everything that the author wanted to convey. So, no excuses and read the whole work!

    # STEP 02 - IDENTIFY AND PRESENT THE BOOK AND THE AUTHOR

    After reading the work, you must be clear about its position in the author's literary production and in discussions on the subject .

    Is this a work that is critical to the general conceptions about the theme? Does it corroborate with all the other authors? Does it bring new and different elements? Bibliographic elements are also important in this identification. What is the title of the book? What is the edition and date of the book? Any formal element that sets you apart from other editions? What is the author's trajectory? What is your profile?

    # STEP 03 - STRUCTURE OF THE WORK

    Make a short presentation of the book's content and the critical analysis you have done. From there, a small dialogue of the central themes can be made with others that are available and you will be able to know the degree of importance of this book in the construction of your scientific article in the legal area.

    It is important to remember that you can apply this same technique in your more technical legal pieces, such as initial petitions, since the function of theoretical elements is to give clarity to what is cloudy in the practical life of the lawyers' practice.

    # STEP 04 - CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRITICISM

    Here is the heart of your review . It is the most important point and deserves the most attention.

    Once again we are going to hit the key: read the book before starting the critical exposition about its contents.

    If you elaborate an entire analysis based on part of the content of a specific legal book, your analysis may be mistaken and this may put all your academic work at stake.

    Some basic elements can assist in the construction of critical thinking:

    1) Make the dialogue between the theoretical element and the historical element: Contextualize the chosen text in the context of the author's life, insert it within a certain social environment and within a specific public sphere;

    2) Highlight the important philosophical and theoretical elements that justify and support the position of the analyzed author , as this way you will have clearly highlighted the points to be attacked or corroborated;

    3) Bring the author's ideas closer to that of other theorists who also work on the theme . Dialogue between ideas along the same theoretical lines and those that diverge;

    4) Make a critical analysis of all the arguments presented based on your hypothesis , corroborating what is important and refuting what is necessary.

    It is important to make two observations:

    First of all, be careful in the elaboration of the arguments and make sure that they are connected and approach the content correctly.

    Second, give a special tone of analysis and depth to the convergence of the arguments that, during the critical analysis, prove to be more important and pertinent to your work, never forgetting to list the references in each of the points.

    # STEP 05 - CONCLUSIONS AND CONSEQUENCES

    At this point, you have already read the work, already listed the author's arguments and the arguments of other researchers on the topic, for and against the position established in the book, being the crucial moment to synthesize everything that was analyzed in a conclusion logically concatenated with all the reasoning constructed .

    It is important to have discipline when preparing the argument that expresses the synthesis of everything that has been studied and exposed.

    It is also essential to explain what will be the consequences of the synthesis obtained to support your own hypothesis. Hypothethis writing can be a diffucult task, consider to pay someone to write my paper. Such an important exercise for your own mental training as a researcher, allowing you to rationally organize your disposition of ideas.

    More Recourses:

    MOST COMMON MISTAKES IN PREPARING A TITLE

    Copywriting goals for digital marketing

    What writing techniques should you use on your blog?

    Tips for writing a successful article

1 comment
  • daniel lee
    daniel lee Good tips, as usual! Talking about reviews, if you enjoy to write ones, I would highly recommend to leave your feedbacks as a client on special platforms, I guess PissedConsumer would become a perfect option for this (more info here...  more
    Aug 17